That’s fair feedback, but clarity and simplicity aren’t the same as stripping ideas of precision. The subject itself requires careful distinctions, and reducing everything to slogans is exactly how complex moral questions get flattened into talking points. The aim isn’t to sound academic, it’s to be exact. If the ideas matter, they’re worth the extra sentence it takes to say them without distorting them.
Great analysis. Appreciate the use of Doc’s tools. The writing certainly seems accurate. Thank you for posting.
Appreciate that. Calibration cuts past rhetoric to truth, and it’s good to see someone recognize that.
I like where you’re going but your academic babble loses me. I feel like I’m reading a term paper. Just write your points in simple basic syntax.
That’s fair feedback, but clarity and simplicity aren’t the same as stripping ideas of precision. The subject itself requires careful distinctions, and reducing everything to slogans is exactly how complex moral questions get flattened into talking points. The aim isn’t to sound academic, it’s to be exact. If the ideas matter, they’re worth the extra sentence it takes to say them without distorting them.